NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Approach S70 42mm vs Forerunner 265S

Garmin Approach S70 42mm vs Garmin Forerunner 265S

What Approach S70 42mm does better (4) and where Forerunner 265S wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Approach S70 42mm
Garmin · 2023Approach S70 42mm
4.4Score
4 advantages≈ $650
vs
Garmin Forerunner 265S
Garmin · 2023Forerunner 265S
5.2Score
4 advantages≈ $450
Higher score
5.3Display5.0
2.7Battery life3.9
4.9Health tracking4.9
3.2Sports & outdoor5.0
6.5Smart features6.5
2.9Build & durability3.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

Approach S70 42mmForerunner 265S
42 × 4212.641.7 × 41.712.9
Approach S70 42mmForerunner 265SDifference
Height42 mm41.7 mm+0.3 mm
Width42 mm41.7 mm+0.3 mm
Thickness12.6 mm12.9 mm−0.3 mm
Weight44 g39 g+5 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Approach S70 42mm better than Forerunner 265S?

  1. Storage16 GB vs 8 GB2×
  2. Screen size1.2″ vs 1.1″+9%
  3. Resolution (width)390 px vs 360 px+8%
  4. Thickness12.6 mm vs 12.9 mm+2%

Why is Forerunner 265S better than Approach S70 42mm?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)10 days vs 15 days+50%
  2. GPS battery life15 h vs 24 h+60%
  3. Weight44 g vs 39 g+13%
  4. Sport profiles40 vs 58+45%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare