NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Fenix E 47mm AMOLED vs Vertical 2

Garmin Fenix E 47mm AMOLED vs Suunto Vertical 2

What Fenix E 47mm AMOLED does better (3) and where Vertical 2 wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Fenix E 47mm AMOLED
Garmin · 2024Fenix E 47mm AMOLED
6.4Score
3 advantages≈ $800
vs
Suunto Vertical 2
Suunto · 2025Vertical 2
9.3Score
7 advantages≈ $640
Higher score
5.7Display6.3
6.7Battery life8.5
4.9Health tracking4.9
6.9Sports & outdoor6.4
5.0Build & durability7.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Fenix E 47mm AMOLEDVertical 2
47 × 4714.549 × 4913.6
Fenix E 47mm AMOLEDVertical 2Difference
Height47 mm49 mm−2 mm
Width47 mm49 mm−2 mm
Thickness14.5 mm13.6 mm+0.9 mm
Weight76 g87 g−11 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Fenix E 47mm AMOLED better than Vertical 2?

  1. Weight76 g vs 87 g+14%
  2. Pixel density320 ppi vs 311 ppi+3%
  3. Sport profiles97 vs 95+2%

Why is Vertical 2 better than Fenix E 47mm AMOLED?

  1. GPS battery life42 h vs 75 h+79%
  2. Battery life (smartwatch mode)16 days vs 20 days+25%
  3. Sapphire crystalNo · Fenix E 47mm AMOLED: Yes
  4. Storage16 GB vs 32 GB2×
  5. Screen size1.3″ vs 1.5″+15%
  6. Resolution (width)416 px vs 466 px+12%
  7. Thickness14.5 mm vs 13.6 mm+7%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare