NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Forerunner 170 vs Instinct E 40mm

Garmin Forerunner 170 vs Garmin Instinct E 40mm

What Forerunner 170 does better (6) and where Instinct E 40mm wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Forerunner 170
Garmin · 2026Forerunner 170
4.3Score
6 advantages≈ $300
vs
Garmin Instinct E 40mm
Garmin · 2025Instinct E 40mm
4.4Score
4 advantages≈ $250
Higher score
5.3Display2.4
2.9Battery life4.0
4.9Health tracking4.9
4.7Sports & outdoor4.5
3.1Build & durability5.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

Forerunner 170Instinct E 40mm
42.6 × 42.611.940 × 4013.6
Forerunner 170Instinct E 40mmDifference
Height42.6 mm40 mm+2.6 mm
Width42.6 mm40 mm+2.6 mm
Thickness11.9 mm13.6 mm−1.7 mm
Weight41 g41 g=

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Forerunner 170 better than Instinct E 40mm?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Instinct E 40mm: No
  2. Storage4 GB vs 0.12 GB33.3×
  3. Pixel density325 ppi vs 136 ppi2.4×
  4. Resolution (width)390 px vs 166 px2.3×
  5. Thickness11.9 mm vs 13.6 mm+14%
  6. Sport profiles78 vs 69+13%

Why is Instinct E 40mm better than Forerunner 170?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)10 days vs 14 days+40%
  2. Water resistance5 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  3. GPS battery life20 h vs 21 h+5%
  4. Battery saver mode19 days vs 35 days+84%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare