NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Forerunner 265 vs Vertical

Garmin Forerunner 265 vs Suunto Vertical

What Forerunner 265 does better (5) and where Vertical wins (8) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Forerunner 265
Garmin · 2023Forerunner 265
4.7Score
5 advantages≈ $450
vs
Suunto Vertical
Suunto · 2023Vertical
8.3Score
8 advantages≈ $400
Higher score
5.0Display4.4
3.6Battery life9.5
4.9Health tracking4.9
5.0Sports & outdoor6.4
2.8Build & durability7.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

Forerunner 265Vertical
46.1 × 46.112.949 × 4913.6
Forerunner 265VerticalDifference
Height46.1 mm49 mm−2.9 mm
Width46.1 mm49 mm−2.9 mm
Thickness12.9 mm13.6 mm−0.7 mm
Weight47 g86 g−39 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Forerunner 265 better than Vertical?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Vertical: No
  2. Weight47 g vs 86 g+83%
  3. Pixel density320 ppi vs 200 ppi+60%
  4. Resolution (width)416 px vs 280 px+49%
  5. Thickness12.9 mm vs 13.6 mm+5%

Why is Vertical better than Forerunner 265?

  1. GPS battery life20 h vs 90 h4.5×
  2. Battery life (smartwatch mode)13 days vs 20.8 days+60%
  3. Water resistance5 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  4. GPS battery life (dual-band)14 h vs 65 h4.6×
  5. Storage8 GB vs 32 GB4×
  6. Sapphire crystalNo · Forerunner 265: Yes
  7. Screen size1.3″ vs 1.4″+8%
  8. Sport profiles58 vs 95+64%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare