NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Forerunner 570 42mm vs Race 3S

Garmin Forerunner 570 42mm vs Suunto Race 3S

What Forerunner 570 42mm does better (1) and where Race 3S wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Forerunner 570 42mm
Garmin · 2025Forerunner 570 42mm
4.5Score
1 advantage≈ $550
vs
Suunto Race 3S
Suunto · 2026Race 3S
6.6Score
7 advantages≈ $490
Higher score
5.3Display7.1
9.4Health tracking4.9
5.5Sports & outdoor6.2
3.0Build & durability4.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Forerunner 570 42mmRace 3S
42.4 × 42.412.946 × 4611.4
Forerunner 570 42mmRace 3SDifference
Height42.4 mm46 mm−3.6 mm
Width42.4 mm46 mm−3.6 mm
Thickness12.9 mm11.4 mm+1.5 mm
Weight42 g56 g−14 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Forerunner 570 42mm better than Race 3S?

  1. Weight42 g vs 56 g+33%

Why is Race 3S better than Forerunner 570 42mm?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)10 days vs 12 days+20%
  2. Storage8 GB vs 64 GB8×
  3. Sapphire crystalNo · Forerunner 570 42mm: Yes
  4. Screen size1.2″ vs 1.32″+10%
  5. Resolution (width)390 px vs 466 px+19%
  6. Thickness12.9 mm vs 11.4 mm+13%
  7. Pixel density325 ppi vs 353 ppi+9%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare