NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Forerunner 570 47mm vs Race 3S

Garmin Forerunner 570 47mm vs Suunto Race 3S

What Forerunner 570 47mm does better (2) and where Race 3S wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Forerunner 570 47mm
Garmin · 2025Forerunner 570 47mm
4.7Score
2 advantages≈ $550
vs
Suunto Race 3S
Suunto · 2026Race 3S
6.6Score
6 advantages≈ $490
Higher score
6.5Display7.1
9.4Health tracking4.9
5.5Sports & outdoor6.2
2.6Build & durability4.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Forerunner 570 47mmRace 3S
47 × 4712.946 × 4611.4
Forerunner 570 47mmRace 3SDifference
Height47 mm46 mm+1 mm
Width47 mm46 mm+1 mm
Thickness12.9 mm11.4 mm+1.5 mm
Weight50 g56 g−6 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Forerunner 570 47mm better than Race 3S?

  1. Weight50 g vs 56 g+12%
  2. Screen size1.4″ vs 1.32″+6%

Why is Race 3S better than Forerunner 570 47mm?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)11 days vs 12 days+9%
  2. Storage8 GB vs 64 GB8×
  3. Sapphire crystalNo · Forerunner 570 47mm: Yes
  4. Thickness12.9 mm vs 11.4 mm+13%
  5. Pixel density324 ppi vs 353 ppi+9%
  6. Resolution (width)454 px vs 466 px+3%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare