vs
5.1Display3.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
8900106 (2023)
| 8900 | 106 (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case size | 42 mm | 49.4 mm | −7.4 mm |
| Weight | 40 g | 79 g | −39 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 8900 better than 106 (2023)?
- Built-in GPSYes · 106 (2023): No
- AMOLED / OLED displayYes · 106 (2023): No
- Weight40 g vs 79.4 g+99%
- Resolution (width)466 px vs 120 px3.9×
Why is 106 (2023) better than 8900?
- Battery capacity300 mAh vs 1,000 mAh3.3×
- Screen size1.3″ vs 1.8″+38%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 42 mm | — |
| Weight | 40 g | 79.4 g |
| Thickness | — | 14.5 mm |
| Height | — | 115.1 mm |
| Width | — | 49.4 mm |
| Case material | Aluminium | — |
| Strap material | Silikon | — |
| Colours | — | Red Terracotta, Emerald Green, Charcoal |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.3″ | 1.8″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | LCD |
| Panel | OLED | TFT LCD |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | No |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 466 px | 120 px |
| Resolution (height) | 466 px | 160 px |
| Pixel density | — | 111 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 300 mAh | 1,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | — |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | — |
| ECG | Yes | — |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | — |
| Sensors | heart rate, ambient light | — |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | No |
| Satellite systems | GPS | — |
| Compass | Yes | — |
| Multisport / triathlon mode | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | — | No |
| LTE (cellular) | — | No |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | — |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | — | Yes |
| Voice assistant | Yes | — |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | iOS, Android | — |
