vs
5.1Display6.0
4.9Health tracking4.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
8900CMF Watch Pro 3
| 8900 | CMF Watch Pro 3 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case size | 42 mm | 47 mm | −5 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 8900 better than CMF Watch Pro 3?
8900 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is CMF Watch Pro 3 better than 8900?
- Screen size1.3″ vs 1.43″+10%
- Battery capacity300 mAh vs 350 mAh+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 42 mm | 47 mm |
| Weight | 40 g | — |
| Case material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Strap material | Silikon | Silikon |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.3″ | 1.43″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | OLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Always-on display | — | Yes |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 466 px | 466 px |
| Resolution (height) | 466 px | 466 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | — | 10 days |
| Battery capacity | 300 mAh | 350 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| ECG | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | — |
| Sensors | heart rate, ambient light | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer, ambient light |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite systems | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Compass | Yes | — |
| Multisport / triathlon mode | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Smart features | ||
| Voice assistant | Yes | — |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | — | CMF Watch App |
| Platform | — | Proprietary |
| Works with | iOS, Android | iOS, Android |
