Dimensions
Size comparison
89002.0
| 8900 | 2.0 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case size | 42 mm | 46 mm | −4 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 8900 better than 2.0?
8900 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is 2.0 better than 8900?
2.0 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 42 mm | 46 mm |
| Weight | 40 g | — |
| Thickness | — | 13 mm |
| Case material | Aluminium | Ceramic |
| Lens / cover glass | — | Mineralglas |
| Strap material | Silikon | Silikon |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.3″ | — |
| Display technology | AMOLED | — |
| Panel | OLED | — |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 466 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 466 px | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | — | 7 days |
| Battery life (hours) | — | 168 h |
| Battery capacity | 300 mAh | 300 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| ECG | Yes | — |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, ambient light | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite systems | GPS | GPS |
| Compass | Yes | — |
| Multisport / triathlon mode | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5 |
| Smart features | ||
| Voice assistant | Yes | — |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | iOS, Android | iOS, Android |
