NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. 9000 vs Neo 2 2025 rund

Hama 9000 vs Knauermann Neo 2 2025 rund

What 9000 does better (5) and where Neo 2 2025 rund wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Hama 9000
Hama · 20259000
9.1Score
5 advantages≈ $120
Higher score
vs
Knauermann Neo 2 2025 rund
Knauermann · 2025Neo 2 2025 rund
3.9Score
1 advantage≈ $110
9.1Display2.2
4.9Health tracking9.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

9000Neo 2 2025 rund
47 × 471440 × 4010.9
9000Neo 2 2025 rundDifference
Case size47 mm40 mm+7 mm
Thickness14 mm10.9 mm+3.1 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is 9000 better than Neo 2 2025 rund?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)8 days vs 3 days2.7×
  2. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Neo 2 2025 rund: No
  3. Screen size1.43″ vs 1.27″+13%
  4. Battery capacity450 mAh vs 300 mAh+50%
  5. Resolution (width)466 px vs 360 px+29%

Why is Neo 2 2025 rund better than 9000?

  1. Thickness14 mm vs 10.9 mm+28%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare