Dimensions
Size comparison
102 4G106
| 102 4G | 106 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 118.2 mm | 114.3 mm | +3.9 mm |
| Width | 50.2 mm | 50 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Thickness | 14.3 mm | 14.3 mm | = |
| Weight | 84 g | 73 g | +11 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 102 4G better than 106?
- LTE (cellular)Yes · 106: No
- Screen size2″ vs 1.77″+13%
Why is 106 better than 102 4G?
- Weight84.2 g vs 73 g+15%
- Pixel density100 ppi vs 116 ppi+16%
- Resolution (width)120 px vs 128 px+7%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 84.2 g | 73 g |
| Thickness | 14.3 mm | 14.3 mm |
| Height | 118.2 mm | 114.3 mm |
| Width | 50.2 mm | 50 mm |
| Colours | Dark Blue, Red, Purple | Gray, Blue, Teal |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2″ | 1.77″ |
| Display technology | LCD | LCD |
| Panel | TFT | TFT |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 120 px | 128 px |
| Resolution (height) | 160 px | 160 px |
| Pixel density | 100 ppi | 116 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | 1,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | — |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc 8910 FF-S | Unisoc 6533G |
