vs
3.8Display4.5
6.5Smart features2.5
Why is 102 4G better than Prowatch V1?
- LTE (cellular)Yes · Prowatch V1: No
- Battery capacity1,000 mAh vs 270 mAh3.7×
- SpeakerYes · Prowatch V1: No
- Screen size2″ vs 1.85″+8%
Why is Prowatch V1 better than 102 4G?
- AMOLED / OLED displayNo · 102 4G: Yes
- Resolution (width)120 px vs 390 px3.2×
- Pixel density100 ppi vs 322 ppi3.2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 84.2 g | — |
| Thickness | 14.3 mm | — |
| Height | 118.2 mm | — |
| Width | 50.2 mm | — |
| Lens / cover glass | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Colours | Dark Blue, Red, Purple | Black Nebula, Bluish Ronin, Peachy Hikari, Mint Shinobi |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2″ | 1.85″ |
| Display technology | LCD | AMOLED |
| Panel | TFT | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 120 px | 390 px |
| Resolution (height) | 160 px | 450 px |
| Pixel density | 100 ppi | 322 ppi |
| Peak brightness | — | 500 nits |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | 270 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | — | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | — | Yes |
| Sensors | — | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.3 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | No |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | — | Proprietary OS |
| Platform | — | Proprietary |
| Chipset | Unisoc 8910 FF-S | — |
