vs
3.8Display2.8
6.5Smart features3.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
102 4G105+ (2022)
| 102 4G | 105+ (2022) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 118.2 mm | 115.2 mm | +3 mm |
| Width | 50.2 mm | 49.9 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Thickness | 14.3 mm | 14.3 mm | = |
| Weight | 84 g | 72 g | +12 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 102 4G better than 105+ (2022)?
- LTE (cellular)Yes · 105+ (2022): No
- Screen size2″ vs 1.77″+13%
- Battery capacity1,000 mAh vs 800 mAh+25%
Why is 105+ (2022) better than 102 4G?
- Weight84.2 g vs 72 g+17%
- Pixel density100 ppi vs 113 ppi+13%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 84.2 g | 72 g |
| Thickness | 14.3 mm | 14.3 mm |
| Height | 118.2 mm | 115.2 mm |
| Width | 50.2 mm | 49.9 mm |
| Colours | Dark Blue, Red, Purple | Red, Charcoal |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2″ | 1.77″ |
| Display technology | LCD | LCD |
| Panel | TFT | TFT LCD |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 120 px | 120 px |
| Resolution (height) | 160 px | 160 px |
| Pixel density | 100 ppi | 113 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | 800 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | — |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | Yes |
| RAM | — | 0.004 GB |
| Platform | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc 8910 FF-S | Mediatek MT6261D |
