vs
3.8Display3.3
6.6Smart features6.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
102 4G106 4G (2023)
| 102 4G | 106 4G (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 118.2 mm | 121.5 mm | −3.3 mm |
| Width | 50.2 mm | 50 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Thickness | 14.3 mm | 14.4 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Weight | 84 g | 93 g | −9 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 102 4G better than 106 4G (2023)?
- Screen size2″ vs 1.8″+11%
- Weight84.2 g vs 93 g+10%
Why is 106 4G (2023) better than 102 4G?
- Battery capacity1,000 mAh vs 1,450 mAh+45%
- Pixel density100 ppi vs 111 ppi+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 84.2 g | 93 g |
| Thickness | 14.3 mm | 14.4 mm |
| Height | 118.2 mm | 121.5 mm |
| Width | 50.2 mm | 50 mm |
| Colours | Dark Blue, Red, Purple | Charcoal, Ocean Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2″ | 1.8″ |
| Display technology | LCD | LCD |
| Panel | TFT | IPS LCD |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 120 px | 120 px |
| Resolution (height) | 160 px | 160 px |
| Pixel density | 100 ppi | 111 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | 1,450 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc 8910 FF-S | — |
