Dimensions
Size comparison
102 4GGTS 4
| 102 4G | GTS 4 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case size | 50.2 mm | 47 mm | +3.2 mm |
| Thickness | 14.3 mm | 8.7 mm | +5.6 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 102 4G better than GTS 4?
- Battery capacity1,000 mAh vs 260 mAh3.8×
- Screen size2″ vs 1.94″+3%
Why is GTS 4 better than 102 4G?
- AMOLED / OLED displayNo · 102 4G: Yes
- Resolution (width)120 px vs 466 px3.9×
- Thickness14.3 mm vs 8.7 mm+64%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 47 mm |
| Weight | 84.2 g | — |
| Thickness | 14.3 mm | 8.7 mm |
| Height | 118.2 mm | — |
| Width | 50.2 mm | — |
| Case material | — | Plastic / polymer |
| Strap material | — | Silikon |
| Colours | Dark Blue, Red, Purple | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2″ | 1.94″ |
| Display technology | LCD | AMOLED |
| Panel | TFT | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 120 px | 466 px |
| Resolution (height) | 160 px | 466 px |
| Pixel density | 100 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | — | 7 days |
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | 260 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | — | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | — | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | — | Yes |
| Sensors | — | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | — |
| LTE (cellular) | Yes | — |
| eSIM | No | — |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.2 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | — |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | — | iOS, Android |
| Chipset | Unisoc 8910 FF-S | — |
