vs
7.7Display4.2
5.5Health tracking5.5
Why is Ice Fit RT 3.0 better than Neo 2 Band?
- AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Neo 2 Band: No
- Battery capacity350 mAh vs 250 mAh+40%
- Resolution (width)390 px vs 320 px+22%
Why is Neo 2 Band better than Ice Fit RT 3.0?
Neo 2 Band has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 200 g | — |
| Thickness | — | 10 mm |
| Strap material | Silikon | — |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | — |
| Water rating (maker) | 5 ATM | — |
| Colours | — | Anthracite |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | — | 1.57″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | — |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | No |
| Always-on display | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 390 px | 320 px |
| Resolution (height) | 450 px | 200 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | — | 5 days |
| Battery capacity | 350 mAh | 250 mAh |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| ECG | — | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2 | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite systems | GPS | — |
| Multisport / triathlon mode | Yes | — |
| LED flashlight | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | — | 5.1 |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | iOS | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Ice Watch Ice Fit RT 3.0vsKodak SW-7204 Smartwatchvs
Ice Watch Ice Fit RT 3.0vsS&T Design Smartwatch Fitness Tracker 1,85" AMOLED-Display, Metall, Herrenvs
Ice Watch Ice Fit RT 3.0vsMotorola Moto Watch 2 Fit6.66.1vs
Ice Watch Ice Fit RT 3.0vsGarett Quantum Smartwatchvs
Ice Watch Ice Fit RT 3.0vsGarett Edge Smartwatch Herren, Edelstahl, Gorilla Glassvs
Ice Watch Ice Fit RT 3.0vsS&T Design Fitness Smartwatch 1,85" AMOLED-Display, Metall, Herren