vs
7.7Display7.4
5.5Health tracking5.5
2.3Build & durability4.3
Why is Ice Fit RT 3.0 better than Smart Band 10 Pro?
- Resolution (width)390 px vs 336 px+16%
Why is Smart Band 10 Pro better than Ice Fit RT 3.0?
- Weight200 g vs 27 g7.4×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 43 mm |
| Weight | 200 g | 27 g |
| Thickness | — | 9.7 mm |
| Height | — | 48 mm |
| Width | — | 22.5 mm |
| Lens / cover glass | — | 2.5D-Glas |
| Strap material | Silikon | Silikon |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | 5 ATM |
| Water rating (maker) | 5 ATM | 50 m / 5 bar / 5 ATM |
| Colours | — | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | — | 1.72″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Always-on display | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 390 px | 336 px |
| Resolution (height) | 450 px | 480 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | — | 7 days |
| Battery capacity | 350 mAh | 350 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2 | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite systems | GPS | — |
| Compass | — | Yes |
| Multisport / triathlon mode | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | — | 5.4 |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | iOS | iOS, Android |
Related comparisons
vs
Huawei Watch Fit 4vsIce Watch Ice Fit RT 3.07.06.4vs
Ice Watch Ice Fit RT 3.0vsKodak SW-7204 Smartwatchvs
Ice Watch Ice Fit RT 3.0vsGarett Edge Smartwatch Herren, Edelstahl, Gorilla Glassvs
Ice Watch Ice Fit RT 3.0vsFitbit Airvs
Ice Watch Ice Fit RT 3.0vsXiaomi Smart Band 10 Pro Ceramic6.46.2
vsXiaomi Smart Band 10 ProvsHuawei Watch Fit 47.27.0