vs
8.7Display5.4
5.0Health tracking5.0
Why is Smart SQ 2.0 1.70 better than Smartwatch JR-FV1?
- Screen size1.7″ vs 1.32″+29%
Why is Smartwatch JR-FV1 better than Smart SQ 2.0 1.70?
- Battery capacity210 mAh vs 300 mAh+43%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 160 g | — |
| Strap material | Edelstahl | — |
| Water resistance | — | 1 ATM |
| Water rating (maker) | — | 10 m |
| Colours | — | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.7″ | 1.32″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | — | 466 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 466 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | — | 20 days |
| Battery life (hours) | — | 480 h |
| Battery capacity | 210 mAh | 300 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | — | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2 | — |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Multisport / triathlon mode | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3 |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | iOS, Android | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Watch 6vsIce Watch Smart SQ 2.0 1.708.48.5vs
Ice Watch Smart SQ 2.0 1.70vsVivo Watch 58.58.5
vsHonor Watch X5vsIce Watch Smart SQ 2.0 1.708.38.5vs
Ice Watch Smart SQ 2.0 1.70vsBea-Fon Watch 2018.59.2vs
Ice Watch Smart SQ 2.0 1.70vsXiaomi Smart Band 9 Pro8.58.8vs
Ice Watch Smart SQ 2.0 1.70vsXiaomi Smart Band 8 Pro8.59.0