vs
8.7Display7.9
5.0Health tracking5.0
Why is Smart SQ 2.0 1.70 better than Smart Band 9 Pro?
Smart SQ 2.0 1.70 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Smart Band 9 Pro better than Smart SQ 2.0 1.70?
- Weight160 g vs 24.5 g6.5×
- Battery capacity210 mAh vs 350 mAh+67%
- Screen size1.7″ vs 1.74″+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 43 mm |
| Weight | 160 g | 24.5 g |
| Thickness | — | 10.8 mm |
| Height | — | 46 mm |
| Width | — | 33.4 mm |
| Lens / cover glass | — | 2.5D-Glas |
| Strap material | Edelstahl | — |
| Water resistance | — | 5 ATM |
| Water rating (maker) | — | 50 m / 5 bar / 5 ATM |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.7″ | 1.74″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | — | 480 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 336 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | — | 21 days |
| Battery capacity | 210 mAh | 350 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | — | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2 | heart rate, accelerometer, ambient light |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite systems | — | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Compass | — | Yes |
| Multisport / triathlon mode | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| LTE (cellular) | — | No |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.4 |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | — | HyperOS |
| Platform | — | Proprietary |
| Works with | iOS, Android | Android, iOS |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Watch 6vsIce Watch Smart SQ 2.0 1.708.48.5vs
Ice Watch Smart SQ 2.0 1.70vsVivo Watch 58.58.5
vsHonor Watch X5vsIce Watch Smart SQ 2.0 1.708.38.5vs
Ice Watch Smart SQ 2.0 1.70vsBea-Fon Watch 2018.59.2vs
Ice Watch Smart SQ 2.0 1.70vsXiaomi Smart Band 8 Pro8.59.0vs
Ice Watch Smart SQ 2.0 1.70vsRadley Series 32 W6LWP denim