vs
Why is Smart SQ 2.0 1.70 better than Series 32 W6LWP denim?
Smart SQ 2.0 1.70 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Series 32 W6LWP denim better than Smart SQ 2.0 1.70?
- Screen size1.7″ vs 1.8″+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 160 g | — |
| Case material | — | Aluminium |
| Strap material | Edelstahl | Aluminium, Silikon |
| Colours | — | Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.7″ | 1.8″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | — |
| Panel | AMOLED | — |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | — | 7 days |
| Battery capacity | 210 mAh | — |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | — |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2 | — |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite systems | — | GPS |
| Multisport / triathlon mode | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | — | 5.2 |
| Smart features | ||
| Music on the watch | — | Yes |
| Storage | — | 8 GB |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | iOS, Android | iOS, Android |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Watch 6vsIce Watch Smart SQ 2.0 1.708.48.6vs
Ice Watch Smart SQ 2.0 1.70vsVivo Watch 58.68.6
vsHonor Watch X5vsIce Watch Smart SQ 2.0 1.708.48.6
vsAmazfit Bip 6vsIce Watch Smart SQ 2.0 1.708.58.6vs
Ice Watch Smart SQ 2.0 1.70vsAmazfit Active 28.68.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy Watch8vsRadley Series 32 W6LWP denim