vs
8.7Display5.9
5.0Health tracking5.0
Why is Smart SQ 2.0 1.70 better than CMF Watch Pro 3?
- Screen size1.7″ vs 1.43″+19%
Why is CMF Watch Pro 3 better than Smart SQ 2.0 1.70?
- Battery capacity210 mAh vs 350 mAh+67%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 47 mm |
| Weight | 160 g | — |
| Case material | — | Aluminium |
| Strap material | Edelstahl | Silikon |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.7″ | 1.43″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Always-on display | — | Yes |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | — | 466 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 466 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | — | 10 days |
| Battery capacity | 210 mAh | 350 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| ECG | — | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2 | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer, ambient light |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite systems | — | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Multisport / triathlon mode | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3 |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | — | CMF Watch App |
| Platform | — | Proprietary |
| Works with | iOS, Android | iOS, Android |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Watch 6vsIce Watch Smart SQ 2.0 1.708.48.5vs
Ice Watch Smart SQ 2.0 1.70vsVivo Watch 58.58.5
vsHonor Watch X5vsIce Watch Smart SQ 2.0 1.708.38.5vs
Ice Watch Smart SQ 2.0 1.70vsBea-Fon Watch 2018.59.2vs
Ice Watch Smart SQ 2.0 1.70vsXiaomi Smart Band 9 Pro8.58.8vs
Ice Watch Smart SQ 2.0 1.70vsXiaomi Smart Band 8 Pro8.59.0