vs
8.7Display8.8
5.0Health tracking5.0
Why is Smart SQ 2.0 1.70 better than BT80?
Smart SQ 2.0 1.70 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is BT80 better than Smart SQ 2.0 1.70?
- Battery capacity210 mAh vs 1,000 mAh4.8×
- Screen size1.7″ vs 2.13″+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 53 mm |
| Weight | 160 g | — |
| Thickness | — | 14.2 mm |
| Height | — | 52.7 mm |
| Width | — | 44.5 mm |
| Lens / cover glass | — | Tempered glass |
| Strap material | Edelstahl | — |
| Water resistance | — | 2 ATM |
| Colours | — | Black, Titanium |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.7″ | 2.13″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | — | 410 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 502 px |
| Pixel density | — | 304 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 210 mAh | 1,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2 | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2, blood pressure, barometer, compass |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | — | No |
| Barometric altimeter | — | Yes |
| Compass | — | Yes |
| Multisport / triathlon mode | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | — | No |
| LTE (cellular) | — | No |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.2 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | — | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | — | Proprietary OS |
| Platform | — | Proprietary |
| Works with | iOS, Android | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Watch 6vsIce Watch Smart SQ 2.0 1.708.48.5vs
Ice Watch Smart SQ 2.0 1.70vsVivo Watch 58.58.5
vsHonor Watch X5vsIce Watch Smart SQ 2.0 1.708.38.5vs
Ice Watch Smart SQ 2.0 1.70vsBea-Fon Watch 2018.59.2vs
Ice Watch Smart SQ 2.0 1.70vsXiaomi Smart Band 9 Pro8.58.8vs
Ice Watch Smart SQ 2.0 1.70vsXiaomi Smart Band 8 Pro8.59.0