vs
8.7Display5.0
5.0Health tracking5.0
Why is Smart SQ 2.0 1.70 better than Watch 5?
Smart SQ 2.0 1.70 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Watch 5 better than Smart SQ 2.0 1.70?
- Battery capacity210 mAh vs 460 mAh2.2×
- Screen size1.7″ vs 1.97″+16%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 160 g | — |
| Case material | — | Plastic / polymer |
| Strap material | Edelstahl | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Colours | — | Black, Titanium |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.7″ | 1.97″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | — | 390 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 450 px |
| Pixel density | — | 302 ppi |
| Peak brightness | — | 600 nits |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 210 mAh | 460 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2 | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2, compass |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite systems | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Compass | — | Yes |
| Multisport / triathlon mode | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | — | Yes |
| LTE (cellular) | — | No |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.4 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | — | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | — | Proprietary OS |
| Platform | — | Proprietary |
| Works with | iOS, Android | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Watch 6vsIce Watch Smart SQ 2.0 1.708.48.5vs
Ice Watch Smart SQ 2.0 1.70vsVivo Watch 58.58.5
vsHonor Watch X5vsIce Watch Smart SQ 2.0 1.708.38.5vs
Ice Watch Smart SQ 2.0 1.70vsBea-Fon Watch 2018.59.2vs
Ice Watch Smart SQ 2.0 1.70vsXiaomi Smart Band 9 Pro8.58.8vs
Ice Watch Smart SQ 2.0 1.70vsXiaomi Smart Band 8 Pro8.59.0