vs
4.9Health tracking4.9
Why is Smart SQ 2.0 1.70 better than Watch GT2?
Smart SQ 2.0 1.70 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Watch GT2 better than Smart SQ 2.0 1.70?
- Battery capacity210 mAh vs 595 mAh2.8×
- Screen size1.7″ vs 2.07″+22%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 160 g | — |
| Case material | — | Aluminium |
| Strap material | Edelstahl | — |
| Colours | — | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.7″ | 2.07″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | — |
| Panel | AMOLED | — |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 210 mAh | 595 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2 | heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite systems | — | GPS |
| Multisport / triathlon mode | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 1 |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | iOS, Android | iOS, Android |
