vs
2.2Display5.3
5.5Health tracking5.5
Why is FW34 better than Band Style?
- Battery capacity105 mAh vs 100 mAh+5%
Why is Band Style better than FW34?
- AMOLED / OLED displayNo · FW34: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 24 g | — |
| Thickness | 11 mm | — |
| Height | 43 mm | — |
| Width | 23 mm | — |
| Case material | Aluminium | — |
| Lens / cover glass | — | 2.5D-Glas |
| Strap material | — | Kautschuk |
| Water rating (maker) | 1 m | — |
| Colours | Silver | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.08″ | 1.1″ |
| Display technology | LCD | AMOLED |
| Panel | TFT | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | — | 126 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 294 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | — | 12 days |
| Battery capacity | 105 mAh | 100 mAh |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2 | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite systems | — | GPS |
| Multisport / triathlon mode | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 4 | 5 |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | — | Android |
| Chipset | — | Ambiq Apollo3 |
