vs
2.2Display7.4
5.5Health tracking5.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
FW34Smart Band 10
| FW34 | Smart Band 10 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 43 mm | 48 mm | −5 mm |
| Width | 23 mm | 22.5 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Thickness | 11 mm | 11 mm | = |
| Weight | 24 g | 27 g | −3 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is FW34 better than Smart Band 10?
- Weight24 g vs 27 g+12%
Why is Smart Band 10 better than FW34?
- AMOLED / OLED displayNo · FW34: Yes
- Screen size1.08″ vs 1.72″+59%
- Battery capacity105 mAh vs 233 mAh2.2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 47 mm |
| Weight | 24 g | 27 g |
| Thickness | 11 mm | 11 mm |
| Height | 43 mm | 48 mm |
| Width | 23 mm | 22.5 mm |
| Case material | Aluminium | — |
| Lens / cover glass | — | 2.5D-Glas |
| Water resistance | — | 5 ATM |
| Water rating (maker) | 1 m | 50 m / 5 bar / 5 ATM |
| Colours | Silver | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.08″ | 1.72″ |
| Display technology | LCD | AMOLED |
| Panel | TFT | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | Yes |
| Always-on display | — | Yes |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | — | 212 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 520 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | — | 9 days |
| Battery capacity | 105 mAh | 233 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2 | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Compass | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 4 | 5.4 |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | — | iOS, Android |
