vs
3.8Display8.8
3.9Smart features3.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
105 (2024)BT80
| 105 (2024) | BT80 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 115.5 mm | 52.7 mm | +62.8 mm |
| Width | 49.5 mm | 44.5 mm | +5 mm |
| Thickness | 14 mm | 14.2 mm | −0.2 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 105 (2024) better than BT80?
105 (2024) has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is BT80 better than 105 (2024)?
- AMOLED / OLED displayNo · 105 (2024): Yes
- Resolution (width)120 px vs 410 px3.4×
- Pixel density100 ppi vs 304 ppi3×
- Screen size2″ vs 2.13″+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 53 mm |
| Weight | 77.5 g | — |
| Thickness | 14 mm | 14.2 mm |
| Height | 115.5 mm | 52.7 mm |
| Width | 49.5 mm | 44.5 mm |
| Lens / cover glass | — | Tempered glass |
| Water resistance | — | 2 ATM |
| Colours | Black, Blue, Purple | Black, Titanium |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2″ | 2.13″ |
| Display technology | LCD | AMOLED |
| Panel | TFT LCD | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 120 px | 410 px |
| Resolution (height) | 160 px | 502 px |
| Pixel density | 100 ppi | 304 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | 1,000 mAh |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | — | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | — | Yes |
| Sensors | — | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2, blood pressure, barometer, compass |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | No |
| Barometric altimeter | — | Yes |
| Compass | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.2 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | Yes |
| RAM | 0.004 GB | — |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | RTOS OS | Proprietary OS |
| Platform | Proprietary | Proprietary |
