NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. 105 (2024) vs Galaxy Watch Ultra

Nokia 105 (2024) vs Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra

What 105 (2024) does better (2) and where Galaxy Watch Ultra wins (9) — every spec side by side.

Nokia 105 (2024)
Nokia · 2024105 (2024)
4.1Score
2 advantages
vs
Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra
Samsung · 2024Galaxy Watch Ultra
9.2Score
9 advantages≈ $230
Higher score
3.8Display9.0
3.9Smart features7.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

105 (2024)Galaxy Watch Ultra
49.5 × 115.51447.4 × 47.412.1
105 (2024)Galaxy Watch UltraDifference
Height115.5 mm47.4 mm+68.1 mm
Width49.5 mm47.4 mm+2.1 mm
Thickness14 mm12.1 mm+1.9 mm
Weight78 g60 g+17 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is 105 (2024) better than Galaxy Watch Ultra?

  1. Screen size2″ vs 1.5″+33%
  2. Battery capacity1,000 mAh vs 590 mAh+69%

Why is Galaxy Watch Ultra better than 105 (2024)?

  1. Built-in GPSNo · 105 (2024): Yes
  2. AMOLED / OLED displayNo · 105 (2024): Yes
  3. NFC paymentsNo · 105 (2024): Yes
  4. LTE (cellular)No · 105 (2024): Yes
  5. Resolution (width)120 px vs 480 px4×
  6. Pixel density100 ppi vs 327 ppi3.3×
  7. Weight77.5 g vs 60.5 g+28%
  8. eSIMNo · 105 (2024): Yes
  9. Thickness14 mm vs 12.1 mm+16%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare