vs
3.3Display3.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
105 4G (2023)2.0 SW028
| 105 4G (2023) | 2.0 SW028 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case size | 50 mm | 45 mm | +5 mm |
| Thickness | 14.4 mm | 10.4 mm | +4 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 105 4G (2023) better than 2.0 SW028?
- Battery capacity1,450 mAh vs 200 mAh7.2×
- Screen size1.8″ vs 1.7″+6%
Why is 2.0 SW028 better than 105 4G (2023)?
- Resolution (width)120 px vs 240 px2×
- Thickness14.4 mm vs 10.4 mm+38%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 45 mm |
| Weight | 93 g | — |
| Thickness | 14.4 mm | 10.4 mm |
| Height | 121.5 mm | — |
| Width | 50 mm | — |
| Lens / cover glass | — | Mineralglas |
| Colours | Charcoal, Ocean Blue | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.8″ | 1.7″ |
| Display technology | LCD | — |
| Panel | IPS LCD | — |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 120 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 160 px | 280 px |
| Pixel density | 111 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | — | 5 days |
| Battery capacity | 1,450 mAh | 200 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | — | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | — | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | — | Yes |
| Sensors | — | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | — |
| LTE (cellular) | Yes | — |
| eSIM | No | — |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.1 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | — |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | — | iOS |
