vs
3.3Display4.0
6.5Smart features2.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
105 4G 2nd EditionBT103
| 105 4G 2nd Edition | BT103 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 121.5 mm | 49.5 mm | +72 mm |
| Width | 50 mm | 40 mm | +10 mm |
| Thickness | 14.4 mm | 10.9 mm | +3.5 mm |
| Weight | 93 g | 100 g | −7 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 105 4G 2nd Edition better than BT103?
- LTE (cellular)Yes · BT103: No
- Battery capacity1,450 mAh vs 300 mAh4.8×
- SpeakerYes · BT103: No
- Weight93 g vs 100 g+8%
Why is BT103 better than 105 4G 2nd Edition?
- Resolution (width)120 px vs 320 px2.7×
- Pixel density111 ppi vs 260 ppi2.3×
- Screen size1.8″ vs 1.91″+6%
- Thickness14.4 mm vs 10.9 mm+32%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 50 mm |
| Weight | 93 g | 100 g |
| Thickness | 14.4 mm | 10.9 mm |
| Height | 121.5 mm | 49.5 mm |
| Width | 50 mm | 40 mm |
| Lens / cover glass | — | Tempered glass |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Colours | Charcoal | Black, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.8″ | 1.91″ |
| Display technology | LCD | LCD |
| Panel | IPS LCD | TFT LCD |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 120 px | 320 px |
| Resolution (height) | 160 px | 380 px |
| Pixel density | 111 ppi | 260 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,450 mAh | 300 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | — | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | — | Yes |
| Sensors | — | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.2 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | No |
| RAM | 0.1 GB | — |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | — | Proprietary OS |
| Platform | — | Proprietary |
