NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. 110 4G vs Galaxy Watch FE

Nokia 110 4G vs Samsung Galaxy Watch FE

What 110 4G does better (2) and where Galaxy Watch FE wins (8) — every spec side by side.

Nokia 110 4G
Nokia · 2021110 4G
5.0Score
2 advantages≈ $55
vs
Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
Samsung · 2024Galaxy Watch FE
8.3Score
8 advantages≈ $110
Higher score
3.3Display5.9
6.5Smart features7.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

110 4GGalaxy Watch FE
50 × 12114.539.3 × 40.49.8
110 4GGalaxy Watch FEDifference
Height121 mm40.4 mm+80.6 mm
Width50 mm39.3 mm+10.7 mm
Thickness14.5 mm9.8 mm+4.7 mm
Weight84 g27 g+58 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is 110 4G better than Galaxy Watch FE?

  1. Screen size1.8″ vs 1.2″+50%
  2. Battery capacity1,020 mAh vs 247 mAh4.1×

Why is Galaxy Watch FE better than 110 4G?

  1. Built-in GPSNo · 110 4G: Yes
  2. Weight84.5 g vs 26.6 g3.2×
  3. AMOLED / OLED displayNo · 110 4G: Yes
  4. NFC paymentsNo · 110 4G: Yes
  5. Resolution (width)120 px vs 396 px3.3×
  6. Pixel density111 ppi vs 330 ppi3×
  7. eSIMNo · 110 4G: Yes
  8. Thickness14.5 mm vs 9.8 mm+48%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare