NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. CMF Watch 3 Pro vs Watch GT 2

Nothing CMF Watch 3 Pro vs Vivo Watch GT 2

What CMF Watch 3 Pro does better (1) and where Watch GT 2 wins (8) — every spec side by side.

Nothing CMF Watch 3 Pro
Nothing · 2025CMF Watch 3 Pro
6.0Score
1 advantage≈ $75
vs
Vivo Watch GT 2
Vivo · 2025Watch GT 2
7.1Score
8 advantages≈ $95
Higher score
5.0Display9.5
5.0Health tracking5.0
4.8Smart features9.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

CMF Watch 3 ProWatch GT 2
47 × 4714.440.2 × 47.511
CMF Watch 3 ProWatch GT 2Difference
Height47 mm47.5 mm−0.5 mm
Width47 mm40.2 mm+6.8 mm
Thickness14.4 mm11 mm+3.4 mm
Weight51 g35 g+16 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is CMF Watch 3 Pro better than Watch GT 2?

  1. Resolution (width)466 px vs 432 px+8%

Why is Watch GT 2 better than CMF Watch 3 Pro?

  1. Peak brightness650 nits vs 2,400 nits3.7×
  2. NFC paymentsNo · CMF Watch 3 Pro: Yes
  3. LTE (cellular)No · CMF Watch 3 Pro: Yes
  4. Weight51 g vs 34.8 g+47%
  5. Screen size1.43″ vs 2.07″+45%
  6. eSIMNo · CMF Watch 3 Pro: Yes
  7. Battery capacity350 mAh vs 595 mAh+70%
  8. Thickness14.4 mm vs 11 mm+31%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare