Dimensions
Size comparison
BT102.0 SW033
| BT10 | 2.0 SW033 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case size | 48.7 mm | 45 mm | +3.7 mm |
| Thickness | 12.6 mm | 10.4 mm | +2.2 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is BT10 better than 2.0 SW033?
- AMOLED / OLED displayYes · 2.0 SW033: No
- Battery capacity410 mAh vs 200 mAh2×
- Resolution (width)466 px vs 240 px+94%
Why is 2.0 SW033 better than BT10?
- Screen size1.43″ vs 1.7″+19%
- Thickness12.6 mm vs 10.4 mm+21%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 49 mm | 45 mm |
| Thickness | 12.6 mm | 10.4 mm |
| Height | 48.7 mm | — |
| Width | 48.7 mm | — |
| Lens / cover glass | — | Mineralglas |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Military-grade (MIL-STD-810) | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black, Orange | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.43″ | 1.7″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | — |
| Panel | AMOLED | — |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 466 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 466 px | 280 px |
| Pixel density | 326 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | — | 5 days |
| Battery capacity | 410 mAh | 200 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2 | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | — |
| LTE (cellular) | No | — |
| eSIM | No | — |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.1 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | — |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Proprietary OS | — |
| Platform | Proprietary | — |
| Works with | — | iOS |
