Dimensions
Size comparison
BT10Watch GT
| BT10 | Watch GT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 48.7 mm | 47.8 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Width | 48.7 mm | 46.4 mm | +2.3 mm |
| Thickness | 12.6 mm | 12.4 mm | +0.2 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is BT10 better than Watch GT?
- SpeakerYes · Watch GT: No
- Screen size1.43″ vs 1.39″+3%
- Resolution (width)466 px vs 454 px+3%
Why is Watch GT better than BT10?
- Built-in GPSNo · BT10: Yes
- Battery capacity410 mAh vs 420 mAh+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 49 mm | 48 mm |
| Weight | — | 30 g |
| Thickness | 12.6 mm | 12.4 mm |
| Height | 48.7 mm | 47.8 mm |
| Width | 48.7 mm | 46.4 mm |
| Case material | — | Aluminium |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | 5 ATM |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Military-grade (MIL-STD-810) | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black, Orange | Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.43″ | 1.39″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 466 px | 454 px |
| Resolution (height) | 466 px | 454 px |
| Pixel density | 326 ppi | 326 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 410 mAh | 420 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2 | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | No |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Proprietary OS | Proprietary OS |
| Platform | Proprietary | Proprietary |
