NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Grit X2 vs Race 3S

Polar Grit X2 vs Suunto Race 3S

What Grit X2 does better (0) and where Race 3S wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Polar Grit X2
Polar · 2025Grit X2
4.4Score
0 advantages≈ $520
vs
Suunto Race 3S
Suunto · 2026Race 3S
6.6Score
7 advantages≈ $490
Higher score
6.4Display7.1
8.3Health tracking4.9
2.9Sports & outdoor6.2
4.0Build & durability4.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Grit X2Race 3S
44.7 × 44.712.546 × 4611.4
Grit X2Race 3SDifference
Height44.7 mm46 mm−1.3 mm
Width44.7 mm46 mm−1.3 mm
Thickness12.5 mm11.4 mm+1.1 mm
Weight62 g56 g+6 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Grit X2 better than Race 3S?

Grit X2 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is Race 3S better than Grit X2?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)8 days vs 12 days+50%
  2. Storage32 GB vs 64 GB2×
  3. Weight62 g vs 56 g+11%
  4. Screen size1.28″ vs 1.32″+3%
  5. Resolution (width)416 px vs 466 px+12%
  6. Thickness12.5 mm vs 11.4 mm+10%
  7. Pixel density325 ppi vs 353 ppi+9%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare