NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Pacer Pro vs Vantage M2

Polar Pacer Pro vs Polar Vantage M2

What Pacer Pro does better (5) and where Vantage M2 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Polar Pacer Pro
Polar · 2022Pacer Pro
3.7Score
5 advantages≈ $380
Higher score
vs
Polar Vantage M2
Polar · 2021Vantage M2
3.6Score
1 advantage≈ $320
2.3Display2.9
3.2Battery life3.4
2.2Sports & outdoor2.1
4.4Build & durability2.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pacer ProVantage M2
45 × 4511.546 × 4612.5
Pacer ProVantage M2Difference
Height45 mm46 mm−1 mm
Width45 mm46 mm−1 mm
Thickness11.5 mm12.5 mm−1 mm
Weight41 g45 g−4 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pacer Pro better than Vantage M2?

  1. Water resistance5 ATM vs 3 ATM+67%
  2. GPS battery life30 h vs 28 h+7%
  3. Weight41 g vs 45 g+10%
  4. Battery capacity265 mAh vs 230 mAh+15%
  5. Thickness11.5 mm vs 12.5 mm+9%

Why is Vantage M2 better than Pacer Pro?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)6.5 days vs 8 days+23%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare