NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. T-Rex 3 vs Pace Pro

Amazfit T-Rex 3 vs Coros Pace Pro

What T-Rex 3 does better (6) and where Pace Pro wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit T-Rex 3
Amazfit · 2024T-Rex 3
8.4Score
6 advantages≈ $280
Higher score
vs
Coros Pace Pro
5.9Score
3 advantages≈ $300
8.3Display5.0
6.9Battery life7.0
4.9Health tracking4.9
9.4Sports & outdoor3.8
8.4Build & durability2.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

T-Rex 3Pace Pro
48.5 × 48.513.846 × 4612.2
T-Rex 3Pace ProDifference
Height48.5 mm46 mm+2.5 mm
Width48.5 mm46 mm+2.5 mm
Thickness13.8 mm12.2 mm+1.5 mm
Weight68 g49 g+19 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is T-Rex 3 better than Pace Pro?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)27 days vs 20 days+35%
  2. Water resistance10 ATM vs 5 ATM2×
  3. Sport profiles170 vs 286.1×
  4. Screen size1.5″ vs 1.3″+15%
  5. GPS battery life (dual-band)42 h vs 31 h+35%
  6. Resolution (width)480 px vs 416 px+15%

Why is Pace Pro better than T-Rex 3?

  1. GPS battery life28 h vs 38 h+36%
  2. Weight68.3 g vs 49 g+39%
  3. Thickness13.8 mm vs 12.2 mm+12%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare