NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. T-Rex 3 vs Forerunner 165

Amazfit T-Rex 3 vs Garmin Forerunner 165

What T-Rex 3 does better (7) and where Forerunner 165 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit T-Rex 3
Amazfit · 2024T-Rex 3
8.4Score
7 advantages≈ $280
Higher score
vs
Garmin Forerunner 165
Garmin · 2024Forerunner 165
4.3Score
2 advantages≈ $250
8.3Display5.3
6.9Battery life3.1
4.9Health tracking4.9
9.4Sports & outdoor2.7
8.4Build & durability3.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

T-Rex 3Forerunner 165
48.5 × 48.513.843 × 4311.6
T-Rex 3Forerunner 165Difference
Height48.5 mm43 mm+5.5 mm
Width48.5 mm43 mm+5.5 mm
Thickness13.8 mm11.6 mm+2.2 mm
Weight68 g39 g+29 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is T-Rex 3 better than Forerunner 165?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)27 days vs 11 days2.5×
  2. GPS battery life28 h vs 19 h+47%
  3. Water resistance10 ATM vs 5 ATM2×
  4. Sport profiles170 vs 256.8×
  5. Screen size1.5″ vs 1.2″+25%
  6. Battery saver mode40 days vs 20 days2×
  7. Resolution (width)480 px vs 390 px+23%

Why is Forerunner 165 better than T-Rex 3?

  1. Weight68.3 g vs 39 g+75%
  2. Thickness13.8 mm vs 11.6 mm+19%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare