vs
5.5Health tracking5.5
Why is VivoWatch 5 Aero HC-C05 better than Charge 6?
- Battery capacity140 mAh vs 65 mAh2.2×
Why is Charge 6 better than VivoWatch 5 Aero HC-C05?
- Battery life (smartwatch mode)3 days vs 7 days2.3×
- Screen size0.96″ vs 1″+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | — | 51 g |
| Case material | — | Aluminium |
| Lens / cover glass | — | Gorillaglas |
| Strap material | Kunststoff | Silikon |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | 5 ATM |
| Water rating (maker) | 5 ATM | 50 m |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 0.96″ | 1″ |
| Display technology | OLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | OLED | — |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 3 days | 7 days |
| Battery capacity | 140 mAh | 65 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Charging | magnetische Ladeschale, über USB Port | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| ECG | — | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2 | heart rate, accelerometer |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite systems | — | GPS |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 4 |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | — | iOS, Android |
Related comparisons
vs
Denver SWC-338vsAsus VivoWatch 5 Aero HC-C057.16.6
vsHaylou RS4 PlusvsAsus VivoWatch 5 Aero HC-C05
vsMaxcom Fit FW42vsAsus VivoWatch 5 Aero HC-C05
vsXiaomi Smart Band 9 ActivevsAsus VivoWatch 5 Aero HC-C055.56.6vs
Asus VivoWatch 5 Aero HC-C05vsXiaomi Smart Band 86.66.4
vsFitbit Charge 6vsMaxcom Fit FW42