vs
5.0Display7.7
5.5Health tracking5.5
Why is VivoWatch 5 Aero HC-C05 better than Ice Fit RT 3.0?
VivoWatch 5 Aero HC-C05 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Ice Fit RT 3.0 better than VivoWatch 5 Aero HC-C05?
- Battery capacity140 mAh vs 350 mAh2.5×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | — | 200 g |
| Strap material | Kunststoff | Silikon |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | 5 ATM |
| Water rating (maker) | 5 ATM | 5 ATM |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 0.96″ | — |
| Display technology | OLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | OLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Always-on display | — | Yes |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | — | 390 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 450 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 3 days | — |
| Battery capacity | 140 mAh | 350 mAh |
| Charging | magnetische Ladeschale, über USB Port | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2 | heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite systems | — | GPS |
| Multisport / triathlon mode | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | — |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | — | iOS |
Related comparisons
vs
Fitbit Charge 6vsAsus VivoWatch 5 Aero HC-C055.66.6
vsDenver SWC-338vsAsus VivoWatch 5 Aero HC-C057.16.6
vsHaylou RS4 PlusvsAsus VivoWatch 5 Aero HC-C05
vsMaxcom Fit FW42vsAsus VivoWatch 5 Aero HC-C05
vsXiaomi Smart Band 9 ActivevsAsus VivoWatch 5 Aero HC-C055.56.6vs
Asus VivoWatch 5 Aero HC-C05vsXiaomi Smart Band 86.66.4