Why is Watch 102 better than SWC-338?
- Screen size1.83″ vs 1.38″+33%
- Battery capacity250 mAh vs 210 mAh+19%
Why is SWC-338 better than Watch 102?
SWC-338 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case material | — | Plastic / polymer |
| Strap material | Silikon | Kunststoff |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.83″ | 1.38″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | Farbdisplay |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | — | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 240 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 4 days | — |
| Battery capacity | 250 mAh | 210 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| ECG | — | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | — | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite systems | GPS | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | — | Proprietär |
| Platform | — | Proprietary |
| Works with | — | iOS, Android |
