NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Nomad vs Pace Pro

Coros Nomad vs Coros Pace Pro

What Nomad does better (4) and where Pace Pro wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Coros Nomad
Coros · 2025Nomad
5.3Score
4 advantages≈ $350
vs
Coros Pace Pro
5.9Score
5 advantages≈ $300
Higher score
3.8Display5.0
7.9Battery life7.0
4.9Health tracking4.9
5.2Sports & outdoor3.8
2.3Build & durability2.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

NomadPace Pro
47.8 × 47.814.846 × 4612.2
NomadPace ProDifference
Height47.8 mm46 mm+1.8 mm
Width47.8 mm46 mm+1.8 mm
Thickness14.8 mm12.2 mm+2.6 mm
Weight61 g49 g+12 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Nomad better than Pace Pro?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)22 days vs 20 days+10%
  2. GPS battery life50 h vs 38 h+32%
  3. Sport profiles43 vs 28+54%
  4. GPS battery life (dual-band)34 h vs 31 h+10%

Why is Pace Pro better than Nomad?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayNo · Nomad: Yes
  2. Weight61 g vs 49 g+24%
  3. Resolution (width)260 px vs 416 px+60%
  4. Pixel density200 ppi vs 320 ppi+60%
  5. Thickness14.8 mm vs 12.2 mm+21%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare