vs
2.9Display3.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
E3Energy E12
| E3 | Energy E12 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 113.9 mm | 117 mm | −3.1 mm |
| Width | 48 mm | 51 mm | −3 mm |
| Thickness | 14 mm | 15 mm | −1 mm |
| Weight | 70 g | 91 g | −21 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E3 better than Energy E12?
- Weight70 g vs 91 g+30%
- Thickness14 mm vs 15 mm+7%
Why is Energy E12 better than E3?
Energy E12 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 70 g | 91 g |
| Thickness | 14 mm | 15 mm |
| Height | 113.9 mm | 117 mm |
| Width | 48 mm | 51 mm |
| Colours | Black, Gray, Blue, White, Green, Brown, Yellow | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.77″ | 1.8″ |
| Display technology | LCD | — |
| Panel | TFT LCD | TFT LCD |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 128 px | 128 px |
| Resolution (height) | 160 px | 160 px |
| Pixel density | 116 ppi | 114 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | 1,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | — |
| RAM | — | 0.004 GB |
| Platform | ||
| Chipset | Spreadtrum SC6531E | Spreadtrum SC6531E |
