Dimensions
Size comparison
E3102
| E3 | 102 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 113.9 mm | 114.5 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Width | 48 mm | 50 mm | −2 mm |
| Thickness | 14 mm | 13.7 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Weight | 70 g | 74 g | −4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E3 better than 102?
- Weight70 g vs 74 g+6%
Why is 102 better than E3?
- Thickness14 mm vs 13.7 mm+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 70 g | 74 g |
| Thickness | 14 mm | 13.7 mm |
| Height | 113.9 mm | 114.5 mm |
| Width | 48 mm | 50 mm |
| Colours | Black, Gray, Blue, White, Green, Brown, Yellow | Gray, Blue, Red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.77″ | 1.77″ |
| Display technology | LCD | LCD |
| Panel | TFT LCD | TFT |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 128 px | 128 px |
| Resolution (height) | 160 px | 160 px |
| Pixel density | 116 ppi | 116 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | 1,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 2.1 | — |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| Chipset | Spreadtrum SC6531E | Unisoc SC6531E |
