NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Forerunner 165 vs Forerunner 70

Garmin Forerunner 165 vs Garmin Forerunner 70

What Forerunner 165 does better (3) and where Forerunner 70 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Forerunner 165
Garmin · 2024Forerunner 165
4.3Score
3 advantages≈ $250
vs
Garmin Forerunner 70
Garmin · 2026Forerunner 70
4.6Score
4 advantages≈ $250
Higher score
5.3Display5.3
3.1Battery life3.9
4.9Health tracking4.9
3.5Build & durability3.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Forerunner 165Forerunner 70
43 × 4311.642.6 × 42.611.9
Forerunner 165Forerunner 70Difference
Height43 mm42.6 mm+0.4 mm
Width43 mm42.6 mm+0.4 mm
Thickness11.6 mm11.9 mm−0.3 mm
Weight39 g40 g−1 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Forerunner 165 better than Forerunner 70?

  1. Storage4 GB vs 0 GB8×
  2. Weight39 g vs 40 g+3%
  3. Thickness11.6 mm vs 11.9 mm+3%

Why is Forerunner 70 better than Forerunner 165?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)11 days vs 13 days+18%
  2. GPS battery life19 h vs 23 h+21%
  3. Sport profiles25 vs 763×
  4. Battery saver mode20 days vs 28 days+40%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare