NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Forerunner 165 vs Instinct E 40mm

Garmin Forerunner 165 vs Garmin Instinct E 40mm

What Forerunner 165 does better (6) and where Instinct E 40mm wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Forerunner 165
Garmin · 2024Forerunner 165
4.3Score
6 advantages≈ $250
vs
Garmin Instinct E 40mm
Garmin · 2025Instinct E 40mm
4.4Score
5 advantages≈ $250
Higher score
5.3Display2.4
3.1Battery life4.0
4.9Health tracking4.9
2.7Sports & outdoor4.5
3.5Build & durability5.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

Forerunner 165Instinct E 40mm
43 × 4311.640 × 4013.6
Forerunner 165Instinct E 40mmDifference
Height43 mm40 mm+3 mm
Width43 mm40 mm+3 mm
Thickness11.6 mm13.6 mm−2 mm
Weight39 g41 g−2 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Forerunner 165 better than Instinct E 40mm?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Instinct E 40mm: No
  2. Storage4 GB vs 0.12 GB33.3×
  3. Pixel density325 ppi vs 136 ppi2.4×
  4. Resolution (width)390 px vs 166 px2.3×
  5. Weight39 g vs 41 g+5%
  6. Thickness11.6 mm vs 13.6 mm+17%

Why is Instinct E 40mm better than Forerunner 165?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)11 days vs 14 days+27%
  2. Water resistance5 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  3. GPS battery life19 h vs 21 h+11%
  4. Sport profiles25 vs 692.8×
  5. Battery saver mode20 days vs 35 days+75%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare