NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Forerunner 165 vs Pacer

Garmin Forerunner 165 vs Polar Pacer

What Forerunner 165 does better (8) and where Pacer wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Forerunner 165
Garmin · 2024Forerunner 165
4.3Score
8 advantages≈ $250
Higher score
vs
Polar Pacer
Polar · 2022Pacer
3.7Score
1 advantage≈ $260
5.3Display2.3
3.1Battery life3.5
4.9Health tracking2.1
2.7Sports & outdoor2.0
3.5Build & durability4.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

Forerunner 165Pacer
43 × 4311.645 × 4511.5
Forerunner 165PacerDifference
Height43 mm45 mm−2 mm
Width43 mm45 mm−2 mm
Thickness11.6 mm11.5 mm+0.1 mm
Weight39 g40 g−1 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Forerunner 165 better than Pacer?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)11 days vs 6.5 days+69%
  2. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Pacer: No
  3. TouchscreenYes · Pacer: No
  4. Barometric altimeterYes · Pacer: No
  5. CompassYes · Pacer: No
  6. Weight39 g vs 40 g+3%
  7. Resolution (width)390 px vs 240 px+62%
  8. Pixel density325 ppi vs 200 ppi+62%

Why is Pacer better than Forerunner 165?

  1. GPS battery life19 h vs 32 h+68%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare