NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Forerunner 165 vs Street X

Garmin Forerunner 165 vs Polar Street X

What Forerunner 165 does better (3) and where Street X wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Forerunner 165
Garmin · 2024Forerunner 165
4.3Score
3 advantages≈ $250
vs
Polar Street X
Polar · 2026Street X
5.3Score
3 advantages≈ $270
Higher score
5.3Display6.4
3.1Battery life5.0
4.9Health tracking9.8
2.7Sports & outdoor2.4
3.5Build & durability4.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

Forerunner 165Street X
43 × 4311.645 × 4513.8
Forerunner 165Street XDifference
Height43 mm45 mm−2 mm
Width43 mm45 mm−2 mm
Thickness11.6 mm13.8 mm−2.2 mm
Weight39 g48 g−9 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Forerunner 165 better than Street X?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)11 days vs 10 days+10%
  2. Weight39 g vs 48 g+23%
  3. Thickness11.6 mm vs 13.8 mm+19%

Why is Street X better than Forerunner 165?

  1. GPS battery life19 h vs 42 h2.2×
  2. Screen size1.2″ vs 1.28″+7%
  3. Resolution (width)390 px vs 416 px+7%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare