NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Forerunner 165 vs Run

Garmin Forerunner 165 vs Suunto Run

What Forerunner 165 does better (0) and where Run wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Forerunner 165
Garmin · 2024Forerunner 165
4.3Score
0 advantages≈ $250
vs
Suunto Run
Suunto · 2025Run
5.5Score
7 advantages≈ $190
Higher score
5.3Display7.1
3.1Battery life4.5
4.9Health tracking4.9
2.7Sports & outdoor3.7
3.5Build & durability4.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

Forerunner 165Run
43 × 4311.646 × 4611.5
Forerunner 165RunDifference
Height43 mm46 mm−3 mm
Width43 mm46 mm−3 mm
Thickness11.6 mm11.5 mm+0.1 mm
Weight39 g36 g+3 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Forerunner 165 better than Run?

Forerunner 165 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is Run better than Forerunner 165?

  1. GPS battery life19 h vs 30 h+58%
  2. Battery life (smartwatch mode)11 days vs 12 days+9%
  3. Screen size1.2″ vs 1.32″+10%
  4. Weight39 g vs 36 g+8%
  5. Sport profiles25 vs 32+28%
  6. Resolution (width)390 px vs 466 px+19%
  7. Pixel density325 ppi vs 353 ppi+9%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare