Dimensions
Size comparison
102106
| 102 | 106 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 114.5 mm | 114.3 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Width | 50 mm | 50 mm | = |
| Thickness | 13.7 mm | 14.3 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Weight | 74 g | 73 g | +1 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 102 better than 106?
- Thickness13.7 mm vs 14.3 mm+4%
Why is 106 better than 102?
106 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 74 g | 73 g |
| Thickness | 13.7 mm | 14.3 mm |
| Height | 114.5 mm | 114.3 mm |
| Width | 50 mm | 50 mm |
| Colours | Gray, Blue, Red | Gray, Blue, Teal |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.77″ | 1.77″ |
| Display technology | LCD | LCD |
| Panel | TFT | TFT |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 128 px | 128 px |
| Resolution (height) | 160 px | 160 px |
| Pixel density | 116 ppi | 116 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | 1,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc SC6531E | Unisoc 6533G |
